I like most kinds of music. Different kinds of music are good for different reasons, and I enjoy them to different extents, but generally there are very few styles that I dislike on the whole. Generally, when I do dislike some particular music, it is for reasons that are specific to the artist, song, album, etc. more than to the style or scene that they are a part of. That said, if there is one sort of music over which I can throw a blanket of general distaste, it is music that I find to be lacking in substance.
Now, musical/artistic substance is sort of a hazy qualification, but I think I've got it figured out (at least for the purposes of my own peculiar world view). The fact is, most music has substance in some way. The most common music accused of lacking substance is pop, but pop music does have a kind of substance. Its substantial element is its pursuit of accessibility, fun, ease of enjoyment, etc. The construction of a generally accessible song is an accomplishment worthy of note, particularly if it can be enjoyed under more scrutinous listening. Brutal/extreme music is sometimes accused of not having a lot of substance, but I would say the pursuit of brutality or extremeness in music constitutes as worthy an artistic endeavor as any.
So what music really lacks substance? The works I find to be most offensive in this regard are not really a particular style themselves, more of a particular mindset that some performers seem to exhibit. It is the attitude of being more interested in expressing their image through sound than any particular musicality.
Yes, this probably sounds Allow me to explain with an example: Akimbo. Akimbo are a Seattle act, usually called metal, but the extent to which this term could be used is debatable. Akimbo are in any case a band that seem to what to blast the fact that they are awesome rock stars through their amps more than any sort of music. They pose, they scream, they pound their instruments, but what comes out doesn't seem to be doing anything other than underlining what you see when you look on stage.
A more commonly known example might be most mainstream rap/hip-hop since the ealy-00s or so, and some preceding. Mace, Li'l Wayne and Birdman, Souljah Boy Tell'em, etc. There is usually neither a particular musicality nor any apparent attempt at impressive or meaningful rhymes. Just sort of "I-Am-Awesome" attitudes compressed into sonic form, passed off as pop music.
Third example just for fun/loathing: These Arms Are Snakes. I hate this band a lot. More of the same, each piece is just their image rather than a song. Each of these examples is just a different performer's take on the same idea.
****
I wrote this a couple weeks ago and felt it was incomplete, but I really didn't have much more to say on the matter so it was left unpublished. Then some stuff happened.
First, I had a weekend of excellent musical experiences, but that will be gotten into below. Next, I was introduced to a band called Protest the Hero. I was at first extremely sceptical of these guys, given their name (2003 metalcore style, straight up), their appearance (one of the dudes actually resembles Ben Gibbard a bit), and the fact that they were raved about by a non-metal music site. Now, the latter isn't always a bad sign (see the bands mentioned in the next section), but it often is. Just sort of depends on the source. For example: I don't, as a rule, trust The Stranger regarding metal. Anyway, immediately I was very impressed by Protest the Hero. They sounded like an explosion of Symphony X-core madness. I was immediately hooked. I listened to their myspace songs a bunch. Then I thought about it a little more.
These guys are JUST WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT HERE. There's a shit ton going on there, musically. It's just dense with action. But there's no real substance to it. It's just a rehashing of a bunch of different sorts of riffs. I wouldn't quite call it generic, more of just a jumble of things. It's just like Dead Man. The band who talks loud, says nothing. Nothing, anyway, besides "LOOK AT HOW AWESOME WE ARE!" This really speaks to me of how powerful this kind of music is. Even when I had just been thinking about these sorts of musical shenanigans, I was weak to its power. Partially, I must admit, I resent being tricked by it. Mostly, though, I resent the facade. Bad music should not be treated like good music, and substanceless music should not be treated like substantial music.
****
Now, the positive experiences. I saw two excellent bands live, one of which was new to me but totally blew my mind, and bought a new CD by another band whom I had already adored. The band I already knew and saw live was Agalloch, the ambient gray-to-black metal band with an adorably short singer/guitarist with very long hair. Agalloch do a lot with not that much, musically speaking. Mostly simple but long songs, standard metal two-guitar quartet, fairly rare overdubs by solo strings or similar. The new band I saw live was Grayceon, whom I was very skeptical about when they took the stage. A guitar-cello-drum metal trio? I thought to myself, these guys are just going to play the most predictable metal imaginable, but it was not so! It was amazing, deep, multi-textured, powerful stuff. I enjoy them a lot. The new CD was by Sculptured, their first new LP since 1999. Boy how they've grown. I think those guys are what Solefald wants to be. Unless, that is, it turns out Solefald wants to be aggressively hit-and-miss.
Labels: music